This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun May 22 13:16:02 CEST 2005
Hi, On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > if you are a not at an IX yet I would really > start to question the IPv6 address request procedures... I can't follow you here. The IPv6 allocation policies are not tied to technical infrastructure requirements, and that's a good thing - we *want* smaller ISPs to be able to get an IPv6 allocation, even if they can't reasonably warrant to connect to a major IX. Especially as upstream prices tend to be cheaper these days than just the access link to an IX, unless you happen to sit in the same city... Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]