This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thu Thuy
thuthuy at vnnic.net.vn
Mon Jul 18 04:43:18 CEST 2005
Hi, Thank you all for your supports. Collect information from your emails, i saw Apache2 is a very popular solution to choose when offering ipv6 web service. Pls don't laugh at me, i used to try Apache2 in my lab. However, my website i tried is very simple one with html only. And now is just my very matter: as my knowledge, Apace2 doesn't support Java application. So how can I use Apace2 to offer a fully application-website like our present ipv4 one (hosted in Sunone webserver). Say in another way, make our ipv4 website support both ipv4/ipv6. That's why i would like to find our about web servers already used in APNIC, RIPE, Kame, other organisations... to see if they use any other webserver than Apache2. When offer ipv6 web service with Apache2, how to make it fully support java applications ? Pls help me once more ! Thanks. Have a wonderful new week. Thuy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pim van Pelt" <pim at ipng.nl> To: "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> Cc: "Pim van Pelt" <pim at ipng.nl>; "Thu Thuy" <thuthuy at vnnic.net.vn>; <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 2:55 AM Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver > Mohacsi, Gert, > > | > | We use Apache2 for IPv6 enabled web hosting customers (<< and we're not > | > | in Japan, we're in Europe/Germany :) ), and have had good success with it. > | > So have we, with a cluster of six Apache2 boxes running behind an IPv6 > | > enabled loadbalancer. > | > | Can you elaborate on the loadbalancer? What are you using for that? > | The "mainstream" devices (like Cisco CSS) don't seem to do IPv6 yet. > We use F5 Networks BigIP as Bernhard suggested. We are extremely pleased with > the boxes (two 3400s in active/passive resillience mode). We have bought > most generally available licences including the (quite expensive) IPv6 one. > > I must admit though: somebody has to foot the bill for IPv6 development > and this product is well worth supporting. Pre- as well as postsales > support is magnificent and the boxes have not shown any unexplained > behavior since we brought them up in the beginning of 2005. > > groet, > Pim > > -- > ---------- - - - - -+- - - - - ---------- > Pim van Pelt Email: pim at ipng.nl > http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment > ----------------------------------------------- > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]