This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pim van Pelt
pim at ipng.nl
Fri Jul 15 21:55:16 CEST 2005
Mohacsi, Gert, | > | We use Apache2 for IPv6 enabled web hosting customers (<< and we're not | > | in Japan, we're in Europe/Germany :) ), and have had good success with it. | > So have we, with a cluster of six Apache2 boxes running behind an IPv6 | > enabled loadbalancer. | | Can you elaborate on the loadbalancer? What are you using for that? | The "mainstream" devices (like Cisco CSS) don't seem to do IPv6 yet. We use F5 Networks BigIP as Bernhard suggested. We are extremely pleased with the boxes (two 3400s in active/passive resillience mode). We have bought most generally available licences including the (quite expensive) IPv6 one. I must admit though: somebody has to foot the bill for IPv6 development and this product is well worth supporting. Pre- as well as postsales support is magnificent and the boxes have not shown any unexplained behavior since we brought them up in the beginning of 2005. groet, Pim -- ---------- - - - - -+- - - - - ---------- Pim van Pelt Email: pim at ipng.nl http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment -----------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ipv6-enabled webserver
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]