This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide tofix I Pv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri Dec 2 14:13:42 CET 2005

* Per Heldal:

> If you still require multihoming, don't your arguments implicitly
> disqualify your upstream as a hosting-provider too

Indeed, large networks may have surprising characteristics.  Router
vendors apparently still do not provide technical means to confine IGP
anomalies.  That's part of the reason why a small AS with a few
upstream ISPs can beat Tier-1s in terms of network availability.

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide tofix I Pv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]