This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide tofix I Pv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide tofix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jorgensen
rogerj at jorgensen.no
Thu Dec 1 20:14:44 CET 2005
I might totaly missunderstand you, but I get the feeling you want us to go back to the root of the IPv6 discussion when it all was started and use some of the stuff that was done before instead of trying to figure it all out again? On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Randy Bush wrote: > > and that was the lie. in fact, the gse proposal was not reviewed > for security and found wanting. many of the authors of the second > document have since recanted. > > you also may want to read > > http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers/esd-secure.txt -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | rogerj at stud.cs.uit.no | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide tofix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]