This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Jul 22 13:10:17 CEST 2004
On 22-jul-04, at 12:44, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: >> Blame the IAB. Apparently, they were the ones who created this mess by >> frivolously adopting ip6.arpa as a replacement for ip6.int. > . The reverse name tree for IPv4 is already located in the arpa. > subtree. I cannot see any good reason why the same service for IPv6 > should use a different TLD. Simple: because it already is. Sure, it would have been better to have it under arpa from the start, but ip6.int was selected. Since this is a completely internal thing that doesn't show up in anything users ever see, there was no harm in that. Changing it to ip6.arpa on the other hand cost lots of money and even more confusion. It's almost criminal. > (Actually I don't see a good formal reason for not using > in-addr.arpa. > - but I presume that there are good technical reasons...) That would be ambiguous, as 2.in-addr.arpa would both be 2.x.x.x in IPv4 and 2xxx:: in IPv6.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]