[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 glue AAAA RRs in the root zone

[Added CC to ipv6-wg at ripe.net, where IMHO this belongs ;) ]

On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 11:11, Jim Reid wrote:
> >>>>> "Jeroen" == Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> writes:
> 
>     >> Wrong, several root name servers (of course, not ICANN's one)
>     >> are reachable over IPv6: read http://www.root-servers.org/
>     >> and edit your db.root.
> 
>     Jeroen> I know those addresses and I also know that all of those
>     Jeroen> boxes have a latency over at least 200ms and very odd
>     Jeroen> routability and those are far far far from to be called
>     Jeroen> production.
> 
> This could be a good topic for presenting to the WG. Want to volunteer
> to write up a document and/or presentation on the state of IPv6
> deployment in the root and TLD name servers, routing anomalies, etc,
> etc? It would be good to hear someone's first-hand experiences with
> this stuff: what went wrong, how it was worked around or solved, what
> could be done better, future directions.

Check http://www.sixxs.net/misc/latency/ and select the "IPv6 between
POPs and well known destinations" option to reveal some ugglyness.
I've been monitoring most of them for quite some time already and I also
did some testing with the IPv6 only test root's (see http://www.rs.net)
The POPs mentioned btw are the located all over Europe at various
independent ISP's add .sixxs.net to find out exactly where or see the
POP page on the site.

Average latency to b.root-servers.net at least 294ms.
H.root-servers.net was gone for sunday to monday and so on....
Not even minding the packetloss.

E and I are also there btw, though that is not on the root-servers.org
site.

> Personally, I don't see why you care about the RTT to a root server. A
> well-behaved name server will make 4-5 queries to a root server once a
> week or so.

<SNIP>

That is indeed true, but it is rather odd when a machine is physically
close and good connectivity between for instance Amsterdam and Sweden
exists and then one still has traffic going over the US...
But this is more a problem of the state of the IPv6 routing tables and
the fact that only I is in europe and is only even testing IPv6
connectivity.

Thus a presentation or better a debate about how the IPv6 routing can be
improved in general would be a better subject and prolly the place for
that is the ipv6-wg. But as people know who go there Gert Doering has
been doing those updates for quite some time already and last time at
least there was some discussion about the MIPP draft. Even as it has
improved considerably in the last couple of years we are not there yet..

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20040721/4ee7813d/attachment.sig>