This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Aug 10 13:19:51 CEST 2004
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:03:08PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 10-aug-04, at 11:31, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> >The important thing about the "/6 approach" is that the initial /12s
> >(growing to /8s) are allocated with so much room in between that you
> >*can* grow to a /7 or /6, if necessary, and don't have to start a
> >second (or even more) block per RIR.
>
> Why is that important?
Because you want to avoid fragmentation. Please read up the RIPE-161
thread in the mailing list archives.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 65398 (60210)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]