This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Aug 10 12:03:08 CEST 2004

On 10-aug-04, at 11:31, Gert Doering wrote:

> The important thing about the "/6 approach" is that the initial /12s
> (growing to /8s) are allocated with so much room in between that you
> *can* grow to a /7 or /6, if necessary, and don't have to start a
> second (or even more) block per RIR.

Why is that important?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]