[iot-wg] extension of co-chair selection process

I agree, this may also be the time to consider whether the voting process 
can be done differently/better.


Groet,

Eric




Von:    "Gordon Lennox" <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com>
An:     "IoT WG RIPE" <iot-wg at ripe.net>
Kopie:  "Peter Koch" <pk at DENIC.DE>
Datum:  25-04-2019 09:15
Betreff:        Re: [iot-wg] extension of co-chair selection process
Gesendet von:   "iot-wg" <iot-wg-bounces at ripe.net>



A pragmatic way forward? I know it is what we tend to expect from Peter. 
But why not?

Gordon

> On 25 Apr 2019, at 08:49, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote:
> 
> Jim, all,
> 
> for one, "expressing support" per thread is voting, not consensus 
building.
> In that spirit, since the WG is perspectively looking for two new chairs 
anyway,
> and both canditates do seem qualified to me while at the same time 
offering different
> perspectives and background, I do not see a need for a continued beauty 
contest but
> would like to suggest instead to appoint both Sandoche and Peter. That 
would ease the
> onboarding process, as well.
> When it comes to the staggered terms, we can still have the two draw 
straws
> (well, an IoT WG should really let them draw batteries instead ...).
> 
> Regards,
>  Peter


_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg at ripe.net
https://mailman.ripe.net/


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20190425/a8139eea/attachment.html>