<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">I agree, this may
also be the time to consider whether the voting process can be done differently/better.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New"><br>
Groet,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">Eric</span>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Von:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Gordon
Lennox" <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">An:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"IoT
WG RIPE" <iot-wg@ripe.net></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Kopie:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Peter
Koch" <pk@DENIC.DE></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Datum:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">25-04-2019
09:15</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Betreff:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Re:
[iot-wg] extension of co-chair selection process</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Gesendet
von:        </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"iot-wg"
<iot-wg-bounces@ripe.net></span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">A pragmatic way forward? I know it
is what we tend to expect from Peter. But why not?<br>
<br>
Gordon<br>
<br>
> On 25 Apr 2019, at 08:49, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Jim, all,<br>
> <br>
> for one, "expressing support" per thread is voting, not
consensus building.<br>
> In that spirit, since the WG is perspectively looking for two new
chairs anyway,<br>
> and both canditates do seem qualified to me while at the same time
offering different<br>
> perspectives and background, I do not see a need for a continued beauty
contest but<br>
> would like to suggest instead to appoint both Sandoche and Peter.
That would ease the<br>
> onboarding process, as well.<br>
> When it comes to the staggered terms, we can still have the two draw
straws<br>
> (well, an IoT WG should really let them draw batteries instead ...).<br>
> <br>
> Regards,<br>
>  Peter<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
iot-wg mailing list<br>
iot-wg@ripe.net<br>
</span></tt><a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://mailman.ripe.net/</span></tt></a><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></tt>
<br>
<br>