[iot-discussion] RIPE 75 draft agenda now confirmed and available

Hi Peter,

>> To ensure it doesn???t get pushed off the bottom due to time, should the 
>> discussion of the charter and the appointment of co-chairs be a bit 
>> further up the list of agenda items?
> 
> to accelerate things a bit, can we agree to not come up with the
> umpteenth chair selection procedure document and just start with,
> guess what, the DNS WG's?

Fully agree that we should adopt an existing one (that's what we did for ipv6-wg.) I struggle with the "draw lots" clause though; I think when there are multiple remaining candidates, the WG ought to express a preference. I know there's no perfect way to do this, but RIPE has existing models (that must surely be at least as representative as drawing lots.) So I propose the procedure used by ipv6-wg and aa-wg.

https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/ipv6/ipv6-wg-chair-selection-process <https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/ipv6/ipv6-wg-chair-selection-process>
https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/anti-abuse/anti-abuse-wg-chair-selection-process <https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/anti-abuse/anti-abuse-wg-chair-selection-process>

Since the ipv6-wg text doesn't name the specific WG except at the very top, I suggest to use that as the reference text.

All the best,
Anna

-- 
Anna Wilson
Service Desk Manager
HEAnet CLG, Ireland’s National Education and Research Network
1st Floor, 5 George’s Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland
+353 (0)1 6609040   anna.wilson at heanet.ie    www.heanet.ie
Registered in Ireland, No. 275301.        CRA No. 20036270

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20171003/6de98c9c/attachment.html>