[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group

> ... that doesn't need to be addressed right now.

> In this case perfect might once again be the enemy of good. If we don't move quickly enough, we might find that things have moved on without us.

> In other words, we shouldn’t spend more man-hours obsessing over details in the prospective charter than some IoT vendors spend creating their s/w update process.

So no time to plan, no time to specify! Get coding! We can patch later!

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

To be clear: I spoke in favour of creating a WG yesterday. I have not changed my mind!

But I would appreciate some clarifications from the proto-chairs - Marco? Eliot? Anna? Jim? - on how they see the time-line/objectives going forward. So what is sought on Friday? What is expected at 75? How do we work between until then?

Thanks,

Gordon