This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed May 10 10:29:08 CEST 2017
> On 10 May 2017, at 04:26, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Given that NCC is a member of AIOTI - https://www.aioti.eu - it would be useful if there was some kind of reference to AIOTI. Gordon, that doesn't need to be addressed right now. [And IMO, probably never. It's not appropriate for a WG Charter to make specific references to other organisations and consortia. That limits the scope. Or causes problems further down the line: for instance if the WG needs to engage with another body. Or if an organisation named in the charter closes or changes its name.] We can have a more considered discussion of this WG-to-be's charter in the months ahead. The v0.1 release Anna circulated is to give the RIPE community an idea of what the WG might do. The plan is to get approval for that at the Friday plenary => get the WG (sort of ) created => have it meet in Dubai. The thing that meets in Dubai won't be a fully-formed WG but it should be that when the meeting ends: co-chairs, more polished charter, etc.
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]