This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 5 21:19:23 CEST 2017
Enisa is "centre of expertise for cyber security”. They give “advice". But its advice is not binding. It is for others to make legislation or actually take action. You will though now be aware of the conference they are organising. Gordon > On 4 Aug 2017, at 16:26, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote: > > I would assume Europol's role is limited up to the point it turns into criminal acts that warrant investigation and prosecution. > > From a European perspective I assume this would mostly fit ENISA's mandate in respect to (critical) infrastructure stability. > > Groet, > > MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]