This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 5 21:15:11 CEST 2017
Well it is a piece of legislation rather than policy. ;-) But I like the style. We will have to see though if it is adopted and with what changes. I don’t think though that the Commission could propose similar legislation. Too many differences between how the US works and the EU. EuroPol could be involved I guess if somebody used a vulnerability to commit a crime. Think WannaCry? But Europol would not be there to deal with vulnerabilities. Gordon > On 4 Aug 2017, at 16:03, Michael Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote: > > Based on this points, I think it's a very prudent and reasonable piece of policy. I suppose the relevant institutions within the EU would be the European Commission and perhaps Europol. > > Best, > -Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170805/807f5672/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]