This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eliot Lear
lear at lear.ch
Thu Apr 20 11:46:03 CEST 2017
On 4/20/17 11:03 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > I'm not sure we'd want access providers to have control over what web cams (or whatever) someone wants to install on their home network. > If the SP is facilitating an intelligent decision by consumer, I would suggest there is value. If the SP is making the decision without consumer having the opportunity to decide for him- or herself, that would be quite a different matter. Eliot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 481 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170420/9e4ba7e7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]