This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Apr 20 11:03:37 CEST 2017

> On 20 Apr 2017, at 09:45, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So keeping the frame in mind: potential problems relate to “things” attached to your home network and what your access provider can and should do about those problems.

Minor nit perhaps: "what your access provider can and should be allowed to do about these problems"?

I'm not sure we'd want access providers to have control over what web cams (or whatever) someone wants to install on their home network.

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]