This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/

[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Eliot Lear lear at ofcourseimright.com
Tue Apr 11 11:39:31 CEST 2017

Hi Victor,


On 4/11/17 11:32 AM, Victor Reijs wrote:
>
> But the road system/provider is not really checking minute by minute
> if someone has MOT! So should the Internet Service provider do that?
>
That would be taking the MOT analogy a bit far, but what if the
operating certificate stated clearly the parameter by which the device
is intended to function?  That could very much be monitored packet by
packet.

Eliot


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170411/eba9ba29/attachment.sig>

Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]