This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/

[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Johan Helsingius julf at julf.com
Mon Apr 10 14:31:34 CEST 2017

On 10-04-17 14:28, Marco Hogewoning wrote:

> For many, if not all, providers the current mitigation to abuse (and non-payment) is a full disconnect of the service.

Yes, and that works both ways too. Do I really want my house
thermostat to stop working because my ISP doesn't like me
running a tor node, and do I really want to lose my whole
Internet connectivity because someone hacked my toaster?

	Julf

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]