This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at ripe.net
Mon Apr 10 14:28:37 CEST 2017
> On 10 Apr 2017, at 14:11, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote: > > As a more Internet related example, many ISPs by default block outbound mail connections to other than their own outgoing mail servers. I also know a number who still have basic filters on SQL ports to curtail things like slammer or direct connections to poorly maintained databases. > > Could or would you extend this to the broader landscape of IoT? I just thought about you can also take the inverse…. For many, if not all, providers the current mitigation to abuse (and non-payment) is a full disconnect of the service. With more and more dependencies on connectivity for a range of (critical) functions in and around the house, is that model sustainable or does it need a different, more selective, approach? Marco
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]