This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-discussion] iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT (again, re-titled from iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5)
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Pending report from Madrid
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Oghia
mike.oghia at gmail.com
Thu Nov 24 12:33:37 CET 2016
Great suggestions Corinne! See my comments in an earlier message I sent as well. Best, -Michael On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Corinne Cath <corinnecath at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for sharing Gordon, and good question Shane.. I found the article a > bit lacking in terms of a clear reason why regulation is *the* main way > forward. It is not said that if you leave the regulation of IoT in the > hands of several different governments across the world that you get better > security standards all-round. More likely, you will get certain > jurisdictions that do a good job and others that don't. > > I also feel that the call for governments to take this up really opens the > door to legitimizing the ongoing efforts at the ITU to make it the hub for > IoT standard development. And looking at the recent discussions on Over the > Top (OTT) services and DOA at the ITU-D WTSA meeting, I am not sure that is > good solution. > > Rather, it would be great if we could find a way to look at soft law > options and encourage the technical actors responsible for developing > security considerations to take the importance of strong security for IoT > on board, if only because if they don't people will lose trust in them and > their stuff they build. > > And there I see a clear role for RIPE and its members. > > Happy to further discuss! Best, > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, <iot-discussion-request at ripe.net> wrote: > >> Send iot-discussion mailing list submissions to >> iot-discussion at ripe.net >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> iot-discussion-request at ripe.net >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> iot-discussion-owner at ripe.net >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of iot-discussion digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Regulating the IoT (Shane Kerr) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:51:10 +0800 >> From: Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> >> To: Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> >> Cc: iot-discussion at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT >> Message-ID: <20161122125110.47650945 at pallas.home.time-travellers.org> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Gordon, >> >> At 2016-11-18 14:10:52 +0100 >> Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > You can read Bruce Schneier?s take here: >> > >> > https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/11/03/ >> your-wifi-connected-thermostat-can-take-down-the-whole- >> internet-we-need-new-regulations/ >> > >> > And here: >> > >> > https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram/archives/2016/1115.html >> >> He's not wrong. But is there a path to reasonable regulation? Can RIPE >> help facilitate this in any way? >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Shane >> -------------- next part -------------- >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >> Name: not available >> Type: application/pgp-signature >> Size: 833 bytes >> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature >> URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-discussion/at >> tachments/20161122/28de5dbb/attachment-0001.sig> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> iot-discussion mailing list >> iot-discussion at ripe.net >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5 >> ******************************************** >> > > > > -- > Corinne J.N. Cath > Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute > > Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath > Email: ccath at turing.ac.uk & corinnecath at gmail.com > Twitter: @C_Cath > > _______________________________________________ > iot-discussion mailing list > iot-discussion at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20161124/c72cd4b0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT (again, re-titled from iot-discussion Digest, Vol 1, Issue 5)
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Pending report from Madrid
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]