[enum-wg] The ENUM Federation: activities, website etc.

Wow ..LNP again .. that was another one of the early US applications of
Carrier ENUM I worked on .. avoid SS7 LNP dips to discover the underlying
LRN .. great!  Thanks for the data point!   Your regulators may be
interested in what Canada is doing .. its mandated Carrier ENUM.  The
discussions in the US are "ongoing"  which means during an election cycle
they are in suspended animation.    

Search for CRTC Policy 2012-24

Is the Russian system open or closed as in access only to licensed carriers
via VPN? 

-----Original Message-----
From: enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf
Of Nikolay Shopik
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:30 AM
To: enum-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [enum-wg] The ENUM Federation: activities, website etc.

On 28/08/12 17:57, Richard Shockey wrote:
> Well the discussions about industry wide Carrier ENUM in North America are
moving pretty well.  Both Canada and the US have regulatory moves to turn
off classic TDM based POTS and move to all SIP/IMS networks. 

It worth mention another big country, Russia, actually soon should request
delegation. As per last meeting at regulatory, this what summary says.

We are need few changes at federal law, which is now in work, because of MNP
will be mandatory soon. Preferable form is operator ENUM. Most testings done
in 2010 in 2011 in test zone, further work are excepted done after
delegation of 3.7.e164.arpa, 4.7.e164.arpa, 5.7.e164.arpa, 8.7.e164.arpa,
9.7.e164.arpa and decision who will be coordinate these zones.

Here is presentation, [Russian]
http://www.slideshare.net/Mincomsvyaz/enum-22-062012