[db-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type

On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:10 +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
[snip]

> That's why we changed the proposal to change the NON-REGISTRY into
> OTHER.

Such a cosmetic change is no big deal (except it is pointless). It'll
depend on the work involved I guess.

It would be a whole different issue if the change involved functionality
to specifically support RIPE's work related to the decision to handle
e164 delegations. 


-- 


Per Heldal - http://heldal.eml.cc/