[enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type

ENUM-REGISTRY or any other terms is good, but, I think it would be 
better to follow the hierarchy model. Having REGISTRY at the top and 
more specific label such as org-detail: to describe the what kind of 
registry  as a child.

Alireza

Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> Jim Reid wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 2006, at 09:35, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
>>
>>> I would like this list to be extended with the term REGISTRY.
>>>
>>> I will note the issue tomorow in the ENUM WG, but need consensus to
>>> take place here, so please comment either here or tomorrow in the
>>> ENUM WG session.
>> I strongly support the idea of having a new organisation type to
>> describe ENUM "registries".
> 
> I was actually going to sugest ENUM-REGISTRY as org type.
> But RIPE NCC told me they'd favoured the term REGISTRY, probably so they
> could also use it for other registries not active in the RIR world.
> Perhaps they have the intention to sell their database to registration
> organisation for car license plates or whatever.
> Would thy then need to introduce another org-type ?
> (License-plate-REGISTRY).
> So should I change the proposal to be ENUM-REGISTRY ?
> 
> 
> Antoin Verschuren
> 
> Technical Advisor
> Policy & Business Development
> SIDN
> Utrechtseweg 310
> PO Box 5022
> 6802 EA Arnhem
> The Netherlands
> 
> T +31 26 3525510
> F +31 26 3525505
> M +31 6 23368970
> E antoin.verschuren at sidn.nl
> W http://www.sidn.nl/
>