[enum-wg] ENUM-capable email client?

* Peter Koch:

> It should not. Last news about the necessary A RR for "." came from a parallel
> universe and draft-delany-nullmx-00.txt just misses the operational
> consequences. Using the "@e164.arpa" part to deviate from the standard mail
> routing algorithm won't fly.

What about reusing the TPC.INT approach?

(AFAIK, RegTP forbids adding MX records under 9.4.e164.arpa, but this
impossible to enforce, of course. 8-)