[enum-wg] ENUM-capable email client?

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:23:09PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:

> You would use +12345678901234 at e164.arpa, I guess, where the @e164.arpa
> part could be supplied by the MUA.  (Of course, e164.arpa should have
> a "MX ." RR.)

It should not. Last news about the necessary A RR for "." came from a parallel
universe and draft-delany-nullmx-00.txt just misses the operational
consequences. Using the "@e164.arpa" part to deviate from the standard mail
routing algorithm won't fly.

-Peter