Re: ENUM test registrar operational

[Patrik F�ltstr�m <]

On torsdag, feb 27, 2003, at 10:43 Europe/Stockholm, Stastny Richard 
wrote:

> Finally we may set up in .at what we want, this is a national issue
> (BTW, did you complain about e164.com from netnumber?).
Yes I did object to e164.com until netnumber clearly stated what it was 
to be used for, and why.

The same way I have already seen people being confused about this 
domain of yours (including people in the Swedish Government) claiming 
this initiative and announcement came from RIPE NCC (i.e. to a certain 
degree approved by someone, TSB/ITU-T/IAB/IETF etc).

Domains for "testing" is something people have been doing in many 
domains (including the one netnumber use of course) so why one more? 
Why announce it on this list which is about ENUM trials, and 
unfortunately the wording in the announcement obviously was confusing 
to people.

You here/now stated clearly your view and why you did this. I hope that 
helps the current situation.

   Regards, Patrik