RE: ENUM test registrar operational

["Stastny Richard" <]

Hi Phillippe

> 
> I think we're all aware that initiatives outside the 
> so-called golden tree can't be prevented but I didn't 
> understand Marco's point this way. I have indeed the same 
> difficulty in understanding how we can on one hand promote 
> "interoperability of European ENUM trials" and on the other 
> set up something that can jeopardise consistency of Enum data 
> in these trials.
> 
> Could you please clarify?

I did this in my e-mail, didnt you read it?

A normal user will have his ENUM Client pointed to
e164.arpa by default aund this will be the official ENUM Trial use

DEVELOPERS and CLIENT designers having not the possibility to get
a domain for their OWN for testing, because THEIR country does not
provide a trial (or has a closed trial ;-) MAY use this domain 
for TESTING. This domain could also be used for new enumservices not
to be entered yet in the official domain.

I understand that most other trial groupa up to now have dealt with
adminstrative issues, bur we have a working trial and working clients,
and our developers requested such a playground.

As I also stated, this domain is not intended for commercial use and
may be shut down at will.

An it is ridiculous to accuse ME of jeopardizing the European ENUM
Trials.

BTW, Up to know I can only jeopardize my own trial, which I dont.

Richard
> 
> Best,
> 
> Philippe Fouquart
> FTR&D/DAC/CAR
> +33 (0) 1 45 29 58 13
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stastny Richard [
	    
	    
]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:43 AM
> To: bill; Marco Bernardi
> Subject: RE: ENUM test registrar operational
> 
> 
> Hi Bill and Marco,
> 
> this is just a test domain for client designers and 
> developers, kind of a playground. Since we have a lot of 
> client developers out of Austria (e.g. UK and US), and since 
> they cannot get an 3.4.e164.arpa entry because they do not 
> have a phone number in Austria, and since they also cannot 
> get an entry in their own country, but want on the other hand 
> to modify their NAPTR records on their own for testing 
> purposes, we have set up this domain.
> 
> This domain will NEVER go into commerical service and is also 
> NOT intended as competition to e164.arpa (you do not have to 
> explain this to me), and may and will be shut down at any time.
> 
> Finally we may set up in .at what we want, this is a national 
> issue (BTW, did you complain about e164.com from netnumber?). 
> So you may use it or leave it, at your discretion ;-)
> 
> regards
> Richard
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bill [
	    
	    
]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:27 AM
> > To: Marco Bernardi
> > > Subject: Re: ENUM test registrar operational
> > 
> > 
> > Is there any necessity to set up such a domain for ENUM trial? It is
> > not in the golden tree, I think.
> > 
> > -bill
> > 
> > 2003/02/27
> > 
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > our ENUM test registrar at http://enum.nic.at/registrar/ is now
> > > > operational for the test domain "e164.at" (in terms that if you 
> > > > register a domain there, it shows up in the public DNS tree).
> > > >
> > > > Note: There's no support yet for the "official" e164.arpa-
> > > Domain. We
> > > > will add support for at least 3.4.e164.arpa soon.
> > > >
> > > > Current features: You may add (nearly) any number (even
> > numbers with
> > > > non-existing country codes), activate the according
> > e164.AT domain,
> > > > and put NAPTR records into that domain using the supplied web
> > > > provisioning interface. Records and domains may be 
> > deleted again as
> > > > well, contact information may be added to the 
> registered numbers.
> > > >
> > > > Your feedback is as always welcome. Please contact me if you
> > > have any
> > > > questions, or if you find any bugs.
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > >
> > > > Alex Mayrhofer
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>