AW: FYI

["Stastny Richard" <]

 

	-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
	Von: Carsten Schiefner [
	    
	    
] 
	Gesendet: Mi 20.11.2002 12:47 
	An: Mr A. Snell 
	Cc: enum-trials@localhost 
	Betreff: Re: FYI
	
	

	Dear Adrian, all -
	
	two things:
	
	firstly, a question for clarification: SGA stands for, I guess, Study
	Group A. Of what organisation?

	Department of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee Stdy Group A

	The ADHoc on ENUM created the Final Report which launched the

	US ENUM Forum (to be found on the www.enumf.org <http://www.enumf.org>  website
	
	secondly and FYI, a link to an answer to the (negative) VoIP impact on
	phone number exhaustion, filed by some telcos.
	
	http://pulver.com/press/pulverpstn.html
	
	Best,
	
	        Carsten Schiefner
	
	Mr A. Snell wrote:
	> re :  negating the global integrity of E.164 numbering resources in ENUM !!
	>
	> NANC TO ADDRESS VOIP IMPACT ON NANP ISSUES
	> 'It's recommended that the NANC assist the FCC in addressing
	> these numbering issues...' There is also an SGA contribution on
	> Global ENUM TLD Evaluation heading to Geneva that specifically
	> negates the global integrity of E.164 numbering resources in ENUM.

	This part I do not read:

	First, there is currently no SGA contribution on the Global ENUM TLD heading

	to Geneva (only one from ATT Steve Lind) and second, who negates the global

	integrity of the E.164 numbering resources, the SGA report or the Global ENUM TLD 

	evaluation?

	and third. the Global ENUM TLD Evaluation does not negate the integrity of the

	E.164 numbering resources, (on the contrary), it proposed another TLD then

	e164.arpa to be under the complete control of the ITU-T

	
	> Whatever the conflicts over billing issues, isn't there even the
	> slightest risk of the service applications babies being thrown out
	> with the legacy billing bath water?

	

	Yes

	see also the ATT Petition 02-10-18 final Voip  to FCC and PN DA-02-3184A1 

	regards

	Richard Stastny

	
	>
	> http://www.nanc-chair.org/docs/Nov/Nov02_VoIP_White_Paper.doc