Re: FYI

[Carsten Schiefner <]

Dear Adrian, all -

two things:

firstly, a question for clarification: SGA stands for, I guess, Study 
Group A. Of what organisation?

secondly and FYI, a link to an answer to the (negative) VoIP impact on 
phone number exhaustion, filed by some telcos.

http://pulver.com/press/pulverpstn.html

Best,

	Carsten Schiefner

Mr A. Snell wrote:
> re :  negating the global integrity of E.164 numbering resources in ENUM !!
>
> NANC TO ADDRESS VOIP IMPACT ON NANP ISSUES 
> 'It's recommended that the NANC assist the FCC in addressing 
> these numbering issues...' There is also an SGA contribution on 
> Global ENUM TLD Evaluation heading to Geneva that specifically 
> negates the global integrity of E.164 numbering resources in ENUM. 
> Whatever the conflicts over billing issues, isn't there even the 
> slightest risk of the service applications babies being thrown out 
> with the legacy billing bath water?
>
> http://www.nanc-chair.org/docs/Nov/Nov02_VoIP_White_Paper.doc