[dnssec-key-tf] Re: explaining the IANA requirement letter
Peter Koch
Mon Apr 28 19:37:49 CEST 2008
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:29:13PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > Thanks Sam. I think it would be helpful if you posted your > clarification to the WG list. Further discussion probably belongs > there rather than here. Since we are trying to get WG support for > these TAR requirements, we may well have to explain a little bit more > to the WG what the TF has produced. Your comments should help to move > things along. well, we might be at the rough edge here. The note Sam referred to was probably my list of questions, but that didn't mean I expressed an (equal) opinion to all of those options. That said, the IANA TAR shouldn't prefer a particular DNS vendor, but I'm not convinced that it is a good _requirement_ not to ask for, say, the SEP bit. Some consistency checks won't be too bad, but the exact form was and is out of the scope of this task force. -Peter