[dnssec-key-tf] agreements on the use of the repository

Fully agree with all your points but this one:

On 12.09 19:23, Sam Weiler wrote:
> 
> Location: we should be talking about a service to be run by the NCC. 
> Even if IANA does (or might someday) run such a service, redundancy is 
> useful.

We need to have good arguments for that, because at the last RIPE meeting
there was considerable push-back and I thought that this push-back
was due to many people thinking that IANA should do this if they 
cannot get the signing done. The thinking behind that was that
IANA already has the agreements and relationships in place to do this,
i.e. authenticate TLD admins. The RIPE NCC would have to build these
relationships. Not that it is difficult but it is another duplication.
Whether this can be sold as good redundancy is a qestion.