This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] term limits for fun and profit

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Oct 15 21:50:46 CEST 2020

> On 15 Oct 2020, at 20:30, Janos Zsako <zsako at iszt.hu> wrote:
> 
> I think putting a term limit may prevent talented people from serving the
> community in spite of their willingness to continue their useful work.

I agree and disagree with this Janos. Term limits might well mean somebody good gets forced to quit prematurely. On the other hand, they ensure there are opportunities to bring in somebody new => fresh approach, new ideas, etc, etc. A regular but prudent approach to leadership changes is generally a very healthy thing to do: just enough to stop things from getting stale but not stopping other talented people from getting a chance to run things.

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]