This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] term limits for fun and profit
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
João Damas
joao at bondis.org
Thu Oct 15 21:49:14 CEST 2020
Hi Randy I agree with you and that’s why i pushed for the dns wg to have a blind period of candidate collection during which no one sees who else might be volunteering. What you see now is the publication of the candidate list after that period elapsed. Turns out no one else volunteered On top of that we have term limits to “force” renewal, so basically I think we agree Joao > On 15 Oct 2020, at 19:47, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > >> >> Supporting Joao is a no-brainer - +1 > > actually, i would suggest it is not. > > [ aside: i like joão, and think he has done a fine job. i might join > the +1s, except for the following ] > > i thought we wanted to encourage new/young folk to enter and play. when > we have an 'election' and an incumbent instantly steps up, and 42 people > all say +1, all within a day or two, this is a total barrier to any new > entrant. > > so, to put our money where our mouths are [0] two suggestions > > o no +1s. leave it until the actual election > > o we might think about term limits > > randy > > -- > > [0] idiom meaning to walk what we talk [1] > > [1] idiom meaning to do as we say :) >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] term limits for fun and profit
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]