This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jonas Frey jf at probe-networks.de
Tue Jun 11 18:58:06 CEST 2019

> > Run a open resolver and secure it propely
> These two things are mutually exclusive. Sorry.
> 

Well, then all of these (running open resolvers) must be wrong:
- Google
- Cloudflare
- Quad9
- OpenDNS
- Yandex
- Comodo
- Norton
- Clean Browsing
- ...


Anyway, isnt this the wrong discussion? The topic is wether RIPE should
block, warn or pass these resolvers.


- Jonas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20190611/908f574f/attachment.sig>

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]