This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Apr 18 15:04:41 CEST 2011
> It's not a DNS problem exactly. But since the macro in question can > allow a RIPE db user to incorrectly duplicate DS record data for > multiple zones, an unsuspecting entrant to the world of DNSSEC will > have a rather awkward time. You could argue buyer beware, but off the > cuff I see no general issue with trying to remove potential errors > before frustration sets in. > >> does this not arise from some confusion. >> >> that the delegation request object allows a macro that has a dash does >> not mean any dns objects have a dash. so there is no actual dns >> problem. and we should also prevent folk such as mycroft-jones from asking for dns delegation. brilliant. randy --- Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]