This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Manderson
terry.manderson at icann.org
Mon Apr 18 14:28:40 CEST 2011
It's not a DNS problem exactly. But since the macro in question can allow a RIPE db user to incorrectly duplicate DS record data for multiple zones, an unsuspecting entrant to the world of DNSSEC will have a rather awkward time. You could argue buyer beware, but off the cuff I see no general issue with trying to remove potential errors before frustration sets in. Cheers, Terry On 18/04/2011, at 7:34 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> wrote: > does this not arise from some confusion. > > that the delegation request object allows a macro that has a dash does > not mean any dns objects have a dash. so there is no actual dns > problem. > > or am i confused as usual? > > randy >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to Change the Dash ('-') Notation in Reverse DOMAIN Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]