This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Wed Jun 16 08:57:21 CEST 2010
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 22:06:11 David Freedman wrote: > > Reverse lookups for IPv6 addresses is a bit of a religious issue. IIRC > > someone (Johan Ihren?) gave a presentation at a RIPE meeting a few > > years ago and said it was best not to bother with any PTRs in the > > reverse zones for IPv6 space. I think his argument was the world was > > moving away from name-based access controls to things based on crypto > > tokens, making reverse lookups pointless. That said, my mail server > > does not accept inbound SMTP if the connecting host fails to have a > > working reverse DNS entry: this is remarkably good at spam suppression. > > We for one welcome our new ID/LOC split overlords :) > > Still, you will need locator rDNS and the locator space will still be as > big... > Sorry, but I understand nothing out of these phrases... Kostas > ------------------------------------------------ > David Freedman > Group Network Engineering > Claranet Limited > http://www.clara.net
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]