This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Tue Jun 15 21:06:11 CEST 2010
> Reverse lookups for IPv6 addresses is a bit of a religious issue. IIRC > someone (Johan Ihren?) gave a presentation at a RIPE meeting a few > years ago and said it was best not to bother with any PTRs in the > reverse zones for IPv6 space. I think his argument was the world was > moving away from name-based access controls to things based on crypto > tokens, making reverse lookups pointless. That said, my mail server > does not accept inbound SMTP if the connecting host fails to have a > working reverse DNS entry: this is remarkably good at spam suppression. We for one welcome our new ID/LOC split overlords :) Still, you will need locator rDNS and the locator space will still be as big... ------------------------------------------------ David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Limited http://www.clara.net
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Reverse DNS operational considerations in an IPv6 environment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]