[dns-wg] a historical perspective on DNS lameness

At 15:55 +0100 10/13/09, B C wrote:

>I'm not sure I really understand your point here

The message was in reaction to Shane Kerr's presentation at RIPE 59.

Temporary URL: 
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/uploads//presentations/Thursday/DNS%20WG%2014:00/Kerr-Falling_Trees_or_If_a_DNS_Server_is_Lame_but_Nobody_Queries_It_Why_Send_Mail_.8ADr.pdf

J. Lame Delegation Analysis for the RIPE Region - Shane Kerr, ISC - 25'
Falling Trees (or If a DNS Server is Lame but Nobody Queries It, 
Should I Get an Email?) Queries to the RIPE NCC server for reverse 
DNS were recorded and compared against which name servers are lame. 
Based on this, we can see which queries are affected by lameness, and 
how badly.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis             
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

As with IPv6, the problem with the deployment of frictionless surfaces is
that they're not getting traction.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20091013/c3bb6fbf/attachment.html>