<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <html><head><style type="text/css"></style><title>Re: [dns-wg] a historical perspective on DNS lameness</title></head><body> <div>At 15:55 +0100 10/13/09, B C wrote:</div> <div><br></div> <div>>I'm not sure I really understand your point here</div> <div><br></div> <div>The message was in reaction to Shane Kerr's presentation at RIPE 59.</div> <div><br></div> <div>Temporary URL: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/uploads//pres<span ></span >entations/Thursday/DNS%20WG%2014:00/Kerr-Falling_Trees_or_If_a_DNS_S<span ></span>erver_is_Lame_but_Nobody_Queries_It_Why_Send_Mail_.8ADr.pdf</div > <div><br></div> <div>J. Lame Delegation Analysis for the RIPE Region - Shane Kerr, ISC - 25'<br> Falling Trees (or If a DNS Server is Lame but Nobody Queries It, Should I Get an Email?) Queries to the RIPE NCC server for reverse DNS were recorded and compared against which name servers are lame. Based on this, we can see which queries are affected by lameness, and how badly.<br> </div> <x-sigsep><pre>-- </pre></x-sigsep> <div >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<span ></span>-=-=-=-</div> <div>Edward Lewis <span ></span> <br> NeuStar <span ></span> You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468</div> <div><br></div> <div>As with IPv6, the problem with the deployment of frictionless surfaces is</div> <div>that they're not getting traction.</div> </body> </html>