[dns-wg] Followup to IANA TLD delegation problem

    I do not think they answer the concerns I have.

As Jim has said:
    
    >Aside from his observations, the 
    >list has been silent. So the WG should now consider this discussion closed.
    
    It is not silent since I rose these points. Political decisions may result 
    from this, this is why I would have prefered to be exhaustive and fair. But
    
    I do not understand your political layer: now we discuss source code and 
    operational procedures.

There has been no discussion.
    
    >[Authors of drafts  will typically circulate them to colleagues for 
    >feedback before they get published.]
    
    This is a BCP based upon three years of work and test by an independent 
    organisation (IETF was not interested). What is reported here is more 
    experimental than operational. Hence my interest.

Why don't you just publish it? I only see it mentioned by you on various
mailing lists, but the actual thing never surfaced.
    
	jaap