[dns-wg] Followup to IANA TLD delegation problem

At 02:38 22/06/2005, Jim Reid wrote:
>On Jun 22, 2005, at 00:01, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
>>- what was the unexpected result?
>>- what did cause it?
>>- what did permit to decide it could be addressed in small committee?
>>- what did permit to immediately understand the problem was temporary?
>>- how was it fixed?
>>- how to be sure it will not repeat?
>>- why was the mail received by AFNIC phrased that way?
>>- I have some concerns learning that Verisign has the capacity to enter 
>>manually in the root? Why was the problem corrected in changing the root 
>>file and not the entry in the IANA file?
>
>Jefsey, these questions have already been adequately answered in the 
>responses from Doug Barton on June 11th and 13th. Matt Larson's 
>clarification on the 15th was also helpful. If  those replies were not 
>clear enough for you, please take it up directly with the authors of those 
>messages.

Dear Jim,
I do not think they answer the concerns I have.

>I'd appreciate it if you did not carry out that dialogue on the DNS WG 
>list. I see no need to continue this discussion any further in this 
>mailing list. Alexander Gall made some comments on the processes 
>surrounding the to-be-replaced template. Aside from his observations, the 
>list has been silent. So the WG should now consider this discussion closed.

It is not silent since I rose these points. Political decisions may result 
from this, this is why I would have prefered to be exhaustive and fair. But 
I do not understand your political layer: now we discuss source code and 
operational procedures.

>[Authors of drafts  will typically circulate them to colleagues for 
>feedback before they get published.]

This is a BCP based upon three years of work and test by an independent 
organisation (IETF was not interested). What is reported here is more 
experimental than operational. Hence my interest.

>Feel free to complete your draft and submit it to the IETF in the usual 
>manner. Or if you'd prefer to have the DNS WG discuss your draft, post it 
>to the list where I'm sure it will get the attention it deserves.

Certainly.

>BTW Jefsey, please fix your mail client or at least trim your postings. 
>There's no need for everyone to see everything that's been posted on this 
>thread over and over again by appending the whole of the message you're 
>replying to.

Apologies.
jfc