This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jun 7 20:17:47 CEST 2005
On Jun 7, 2005, at 18:04, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > for "fun" - some folks rotate the various canonical names > that exist for any given A or AAAA or (for difficult types) > A6 records that exist. > > and Jim, you confuse me. Mission accomplished! :-) > posit: > > twinkle.little.bat. AAAA 3ffe::dead:beef > muffet.satona.tuffit. aaaa 3ffe::dead:beef > PDC.e164.arpa. AAAA 3ffe::dead:beef > > which is THE canonical lable for the address 3ffe::dead:beef ?? I dunno. It'll be whatever one you've decided will be the canonical label today. After all you did say you rotated them for fun....
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]