This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jun 7 20:17:47 CEST 2005

On Jun 7, 2005, at 18:04, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

> 	for "fun" - some folks rotate the various canonical names
> 	that exist for any given A or AAAA or (for difficult types)
> 	A6 records that exist.
>
> 	and Jim, you confuse me.

Mission  accomplished! :-)

> posit:
>
> twinkle.little.bat.	AAAA	3ffe::dead:beef
> muffet.satona.tuffit.	aaaa	3ffe::dead:beef
> PDC.e164.arpa.		AAAA	3ffe::dead:beef
>
> 	which is THE canonical lable for the address 3ffe::dead:beef ??

I dunno. It'll be whatever one you've decided will be the canonical 
label today. After all you did say you rotated them for fun....

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]