This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue Jun 7 19:04:28 CEST 2005
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:49:12PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > >If you allow multiple names to one address, what do you put in the PTR > >record that will yield meaningful results in logs? > > Well I personally make sure PTR records always return the canonical > name of the host and nothing else, no matter how many A or AAAA records > exist for that IP address. for "fun" - some folks rotate the various canonical names that exist for any given A or AAAA or (for difficult types) A6 records that exist. and Jim, you confuse me. posit: twinkle.little.bat. AAAA 3ffe::dead:beef muffet.satona.tuffit. aaaa 3ffe::dead:beef PDC.e164.arpa. AAAA 3ffe::dead:beef which is THE canonical lable for the address 3ffe::dead:beef ?? --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]