This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jaap Akkerhuis jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Aug 24 10:30:59 CEST 2005

On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:56:49 +0200
Marcos Sanz/Denic <sanz at denic.de> wrote:

> 
> To my eyes the proposal is good and I am happy somebody is taking the 
> plunge. Congratulations.
> Two comments:
> 
> http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/dnssec/key-maintenance-procedure.html
> To a layman, the meaning of DLV can't be tracked down. A reference 
> missing?

As far as I know, at that time there wasn't a publication to refer to
at the time that the procedure was published. There are now two: an ID
from Sam Weiler and an articl in a Journal from Paul Vixie. It
describes similar methods which different details.

	jaap

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]