This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Johan Ihrén
johani at autonomica.se
Thu Oct 28 15:55:36 CEST 2004
Hi Piet, > Now you hit upon an interesting issue. In NL we were more or less > forced a couple of years ago to open up registration for private > persons too, the reasoning behind it being 'fixed' e-mail addresses > even when people moved to another ISP, which happened frequently. > Initially we 'solved' this by introducing numeric SLD's (123.nl), > under which they could register names. That was not a success, to > put it mildly: all in all we registered less than 1000 domains of > that kind. Main reason: people didn't like the numeric "extension". > More recently .NL itself was opened up for private persons too, but > now we see a vastly different situation from a couple of years ago: > because of the massive amounts of spam 'fixed' addresses are not > en vogue anymore and lots of people have loads of addresses. Which > is just one reason why I don't expect TLD's to explode and a good > example of a problem that solves itself. Interesting. While I've many times have seen spam described as a problem this it the first time ever I've seen it described as a solution to another problem ;-) Johan
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]