This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Oct 27 12:16:44 CEST 2004
At 4:23 PM +0300 2004-10-25, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote: > Actually you do not have to run a database instance > on every node where you want to run a DNS server. Why not have the > Database system produce the zone files for the nameserver of your taste > (be it NSD, tinydns, BIND, etc) and then rsync to the actual servers? Well, for NSD, using large zones will cause it to eat memory exponentially. It pre-calculates all possible questions and all possible answers before it loads the zone(s), and then creates a jump table. Eh? This is complete nonsense (or I don't know what the word exponential means). There rest of this messages is full of FUD. jaap
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]