This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Oct 27 11:38:49 CEST 2004
>> When they run out of two-letter ccTLDs that they can hand out, what >> do you think they're going to do? > > Recycle. IIRC, CS used to symbolise Chechosolvakia (sp?) and now it > stands for Serbia & Montenegro. How long do you have to wait before you recycle? What if recycling still isn't enough to solve the collision problem for a given set of initial characters? I've been told that there has been some discussions with the 3166-1 maintenance agency about this when the CS label got recycled. The agency is aware of the problems this might cause and has promised to adapt its policy. Basically, when recycling, wait years to reuse the old code. jaap
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]